6 research outputs found
Large-Scale Analysis of Pop-Up Scam on Typosquatting URLs
Today, many different types of scams can be found on the internet. Online
criminals are always finding new creative ways to trick internet users, be it
in the form of lottery scams, downloading scam apps for smartphones or fake
gambling websites. This paper presents a large-scale study on one particular
delivery method of online scam: pop-up scam on typosquatting domains.
Typosquatting describes the concept of registering domains which are very
similar to existing ones while deliberately containing common typing errors;
these domains are then used to trick online users while under the belief of
browsing the intended website. Pop-up scam uses JavaScript alert boxes to
present a message which attracts the user's attention very effectively, as they
are a blocking user interface element.
Our study among typosquatting domains derived from the Alexa Top 1 Million
list revealed on 8255 distinct typosquatting URLs a total of 9857 pop-up
messages, out of which 8828 were malicious. The vast majority of those distinct
URLs (7176) were targeted and displayed pop-up messages to one specific HTTP
user agent only. Based on our scans, we present an in-depth analysis as well as
a detailed classification of different targeting parameters (user agent and
language) which triggered varying kinds of pop-up scams.Comment: 9 pages, 11 figure
Tinnitus: Distinguishing between Subjectively Perceived Loudness and Tinnitus-Related Distress
OBJECTIVES: Overall success of current tinnitus therapies is low, which may be due to the heterogeneity of tinnitus patients. Therefore, subclassification of tinnitus patients is expected to improve therapeutic allocation, which, in turn, is hoped to improve therapeutic success for the individual patient. The present study aims to define factors that differentially influence subjectively perceived tinnitus loudness and tinnitus-related distress. METHODS: In a questionnaire-based cross-sectional survey, the data of 4705 individuals with tinnitus were analyzed. The self-report questionnaire contained items about subjective tinnitus loudness, type of onset, awareness and localization of the tinnitus, hearing impairment, chronic comorbidities, sleep quality, and psychometrically validated questionnaires addressing tinnitus-related distress, depressivity, anxiety, and somatic symptom severity. In a binary step-wise logistic regression model, we tested the predictive power of these variables on subjective tinnitus loudness and tinnitus-related distress. RESULTS: The present data contribute to the distinction between subjective tinnitus loudness and tinnitus-related distress. Whereas subjective loudness was associated with permanent awareness and binaural localization of the tinnitus, tinnitus-related distress was associated with depressivity, anxiety, and somatic symptom severity. CONCLUSIONS: Subjective tinnitus loudness and the potential presence of severe depressivity, anxiety, and somatic symptom severity should be assessed separately from tinnitus-related distress. If loud tinnitus is the major complaint together with mild or moderate tinnitus-related distress, therapies should focus on auditory perception. If levels of depressivity, anxiety or somatic symptom severity are severe, therapies and further diagnosis should focus on these symptoms at first